I have heard from many on Facebook that they think Perry won the GOP debate last night. I disagree.
I have a fundamental problem with Perry, and most of the rest of the candidates in their belief that government is supposed to be taking care of people. That is not what government is for. Government, especially our Constitutional Republic, is supposed to protect our liberty and God given rights, so that we can be free to solve our own problems and not look to someone else to solve them for us. I understand what Perry was saying about wanting to save young girls from cancer, but when oh when is that ever supposed to be a responsibility of government? Never! There is nothing in the Constitution that authorizes any government to oversee any such activity. IF government is to be involved, it should be in providing incentive to private medical companies and or not-for-profit enterprises and or churches or other citizen run organizations to do the things that can fight against cancer, etc. But government involvement is just plain and simple, wrong. Perry does not get that. Neither does Romney.
Romney lost me permanently from here on out when he started talking about the Federal Reserve being a good thing that we should support and keep. You gotta be kidding me Romney! Either he is totally clueless to the sinister activities of the Federal Reserve, or he knows of their behind the scenes power and is saying what he has to say to get their support for his election. How can anyone seriously believe that a non government banking organization is good that provides us a worthless currency and charges us interest for it's use. It is the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time! Maybe Romney will change his tune towards them like Reagan did after he gets elected. I don't know. Just conjecture.
The worst candidate on the stage last night is the governor from Utah. John Huntsman. As a native Utahn, I was so glad when he left Utah to go to China for Obama. The difference between Huntsman and Obama is in degrees, not in breed. They are both progressives.
I liked alot of things that Herman Cain said. But the one I liked the most continues to be Ron Paul. He is still the only one who truly conforms to the Constitution. Michelle Bachman is 2nd in Constitutional inclinations, but she is a distant second. I would vote for Romney in a heart beat if he would support the Constitution better.
Perry is a progressive liberal in GOP clothing. He is most obviously, the favored GOP candidate by the mainstream media. They post more articles about him than any of the others, which is a big red flag for me, right there! Perry is the leftists choice just as McCain was their choice in the last presidential election. They knew McCain would lose to Obama, and if he didn't, his policies would not be much different than Obama's. The same with Perry. IF he gets chosen in the primary, and IF he happens to beat Obama, his policies will not be much different than Obama's. He talks the talk such as eliminating Obamacare on day one of his term in the White house, but I would not be the least surprised if it turned out that there was some excuse or other issue that would come up that he would say prevented him from getting rid of it, or only allowing him to get rid of part of it, etc.
The main reason for Obamacare is not for health care for the masses. It is for the millions of health care workers who will be forced into the labor unions once it takes effect. That will mean $$Billions more dollars being pumped into the Labor unions in the form of forced union dues, whose leaders have publicly admitted their allegiance to Communism and the destruction of the free market society of America. Perry would play along with their agendas, I am quite certain.
For the sake of Freedom, and the restoration of true constitutional government, Ron Paul is the man, and the left is scared to death of him. They totally ignore him and do not report the truth of the fact that Ron Paul leads in almost all polls being taken, but they will not report that. They say that Romney and Perry are the front runners, but that is a lie. Ron Paul is the leader in almost all conservative polls. I fear for our Country.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
$2.00 or less for a gallon of Gasoline? Yes it is possible, and here is how:
Today is August 24, 2011.
Last week I saw a video Clip where Michelle Bachman, a GOP presidential candidate, said she would strive to have $2.00 a gallon gasoline for Americans again. On a separate clip, there was some progressive commentator saying that Michelle Bachman is nuts, that there will never, ever again be $2.00 p/g for Americans.
To that I replied thus on a public discourse:
Subject: American OIL - Best to be sitting down when you read this.
Here's an astonishing read. Important and verifiable information:
About six months ago, this writer was watching a news program on oil and one
That's enough energy resource to fully fuel the American economy for over 2,000 years straight. And if THAT didn't throw you on the floor, then this next one should - because it's from 2006 !
U. S. Oil Discovery - Largest Reserve in the World
Stansberry Report Online - 4/20/2006
Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains lies the largest untapped oil reserve in the world. It is estimated to be more than 2 TRILLION barrels. On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction. In three and a half years of high oil prices none has been extracted. With this motherload of oil why are we still fighting over off-shore drilling?
Understanding that the last big oil rig disaster that happened in the gulf of Mexico could very well have been caused by sabotage, despite what the media reports tell us, why risk drilling off shore and risk disasters, whether accidental or intentional, that affect so many people and wild sea life, and eco systems etc., when there is so much to be had on shore, within our own boarders?
Obama has already allowed our oil drilling sea rigs to go work off the coast of Brazil, having banned them from the coast of the USA, so why not go for our inland resources, especially when we have the technology and know how to access them without damaing the environment, and leaving it as nice as we found it after we are done. So if environmentalists are truly concerned about protecting our environment, it is a non issue now. Proof of this claim can be found in Utah, where there are many natural gas wells that are practically invisible to the average person hiking around the wilderness, they have been so well covered over by natural vegetation and other wilderness qualities. You would never know any drilling ever took place there.
We need to extract what he have and get our economy going again, boost our national security by cutting off our total dependence on foreign oil and then use the prosperity of our boosted economy to develop strong alternative non polluting fuel sources like hydrogen for one example.
This stunning reported news: We have more oil inside our American borders, than all the other proven reserves on earth. Here are the official estimates:
8 times as much oil as Saudi Arabia
18 times as much oil as Iraq
21 times as much oil as Kuwait
22 times as much oil as Iran
500 times as much oil as Yemen
and it's all right here in the Western United States !!!!!!
HOW can this BE? HOW can we NOT BE extracting this? Because the Progressives and their environmentalist cohorts and others have blocked all efforts to help America become independent of foreign oil! This is tantamount to traitorous activity! Anything that would compromise the national security of our nation is traitorous. Blocking the way to be independent on our energy resources opens us up to defeat by our enemies. Again, we are letting a small group of people dictate our lives and our economy. WHY?
James Bartis, lead researcher with the study says we've got more oil in this very compact area than the entire Middle East, more than 2 TRILLION barrels untapped. That's more than all the proven oil reserves of crude oil in the world today, reportsThe Denver Post.
Don't think 'OPEC' will drop its price even with this find? Think again! It's all about the competitive marketplace, it has to. Think OPEC just might be funding the progressive environmentalists? Cannot prove it, but would not doubt it.
All of this can be verified. Check it out at the links below:
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911
Curz Construction:
http://www.cruzconstruct.com/services.php
Last week I saw a video Clip where Michelle Bachman, a GOP presidential candidate, said she would strive to have $2.00 a gallon gasoline for Americans again. On a separate clip, there was some progressive commentator saying that Michelle Bachman is nuts, that there will never, ever again be $2.00 p/g for Americans.
To that I replied thus on a public discourse:
Subject: American OIL - Best to be sitting down when you read this.
As you may know, Cruz Construction started a division in North Dakota just six months ago. They sent every Kenworth (9 trucks) they had in Alaska to North Dakota along with several drivers. They just bought two new Kenworth’s to add to that fleet; one being a Tri Drive tractor and a new 65 ton lowboy to go with it. They also bought two new cranes (one crawler & one rubber tired) for that division. Dave Cruz said they have moved more rigs in the last 6 months in ND than Cruz Construction moved in Alaska in the last 6 years. Williston is like a gold rush town; they moved one of their 40 man camps down there since there are no rooms available. Unemployment in ND is the lowest in the nation at 3.4 percent. Have you seen anything in the national news about how the oil industry is fueling North Dakota’s economy? Nope! Not a single mention.
Here's an astonishing read. Important and verifiable information:
About six months ago, this writer was watching a news program on oil and one
of the Forbes Bros. was the guest. The host said to Forbes, "I am going to ask
you a direct question and I would like a direct answer; how much oil does the
U.S. have in the ground?" Forbes did not miss a beat, he said, "more than all
the Middle East put together."
The U. S. Geological Service issued a report in April 2008 that only scientists and oil men knew was coming. It was big! It was a revised report (hadn't been updated since 1995) on how much oil is in the area of the western 2/3 of North Dakota, western South Dakota, and extreme eastern Montana.
The Bakken is the largest domestic oil discovery since Alaska's Prudhoe Bay, and has the potential to eliminate all American dependence on foreign oil. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates it at 503 billion barrels. Even if just 10% of the oil is recoverable (5 billion barrels), at $107 a barrel,
The U. S. Geological Service issued a report in April 2008 that only scientists and oil men knew was coming. It was big! It was a revised report (hadn't been updated since 1995) on how much oil is in the area of the western 2/3 of North Dakota, western South Dakota, and extreme eastern Montana.
The Bakken is the largest domestic oil discovery since Alaska's Prudhoe Bay, and has the potential to eliminate all American dependence on foreign oil. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates it at 503 billion barrels. Even if just 10% of the oil is recoverable (5 billion barrels), at $107 a barrel,
we're looking at a resource base worth more than $5.3 trillion.
"When I first briefed legislators on this, you could practically see their jaws hit the floor. They had no idea.." says Terry Johnson, the Montana Legislature's financial analyst.
"This sizable find is now the highest-producing onshore oil field found in the past 56 years," reports The Pittsburgh Post Gazette. It's a formation known as the Williston Basin, but is more commonly referred to as the 'Bakken.' It stretches from Northern Montana, through North Dakota and into Canada.
For years, U.S. oil exploration has been considered a dead end. Even the 'Big Oil' companies gave up searching for major oil wells decades ago. However, a recent technological breakthrough has opened up the Bakken's massive reserves, and we now have access of up to 500 billion barrels. And because this is light, sweet oil, those billions of barrels will cost Americans an average of just $16 PER BARREL! To put that dollar amount in perspective, the oil we import from the OPEC nations today is around $85.00 to $110.00 per barrel.
"When I first briefed legislators on this, you could practically see their jaws hit the floor. They had no idea.." says Terry Johnson, the Montana Legislature's financial analyst.
"This sizable find is now the highest-producing onshore oil field found in the past 56 years," reports The Pittsburgh Post Gazette. It's a formation known as the Williston Basin, but is more commonly referred to as the 'Bakken.' It stretches from Northern Montana, through North Dakota and into Canada.
For years, U.S. oil exploration has been considered a dead end. Even the 'Big Oil' companies gave up searching for major oil wells decades ago. However, a recent technological breakthrough has opened up the Bakken's massive reserves, and we now have access of up to 500 billion barrels. And because this is light, sweet oil, those billions of barrels will cost Americans an average of just $16 PER BARREL! To put that dollar amount in perspective, the oil we import from the OPEC nations today is around $85.00 to $110.00 per barrel.
That's enough energy resource to fully fuel the American economy for over 2,000 years straight. And if THAT didn't throw you on the floor, then this next one should - because it's from 2006 !
U. S. Oil Discovery - Largest Reserve in the World
Stansberry Report Online - 4/20/2006
Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains lies the largest untapped oil reserve in the world. It is estimated to be more than 2 TRILLION barrels. On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction. In three and a half years of high oil prices none has been extracted. With this motherload of oil why are we still fighting over off-shore drilling?
Understanding that the last big oil rig disaster that happened in the gulf of Mexico could very well have been caused by sabotage, despite what the media reports tell us, why risk drilling off shore and risk disasters, whether accidental or intentional, that affect so many people and wild sea life, and eco systems etc., when there is so much to be had on shore, within our own boarders?
Obama has already allowed our oil drilling sea rigs to go work off the coast of Brazil, having banned them from the coast of the USA, so why not go for our inland resources, especially when we have the technology and know how to access them without damaing the environment, and leaving it as nice as we found it after we are done. So if environmentalists are truly concerned about protecting our environment, it is a non issue now. Proof of this claim can be found in Utah, where there are many natural gas wells that are practically invisible to the average person hiking around the wilderness, they have been so well covered over by natural vegetation and other wilderness qualities. You would never know any drilling ever took place there.
We need to extract what he have and get our economy going again, boost our national security by cutting off our total dependence on foreign oil and then use the prosperity of our boosted economy to develop strong alternative non polluting fuel sources like hydrogen for one example.
This stunning reported news: We have more oil inside our American borders, than all the other proven reserves on earth. Here are the official estimates:
8 times as much oil as Saudi Arabia
18 times as much oil as Iraq
21 times as much oil as Kuwait
22 times as much oil as Iran
500 times as much oil as Yemen
and it's all right here in the Western United States !!!!!!
HOW can this BE? HOW can we NOT BE extracting this? Because the Progressives and their environmentalist cohorts and others have blocked all efforts to help America become independent of foreign oil! This is tantamount to traitorous activity! Anything that would compromise the national security of our nation is traitorous. Blocking the way to be independent on our energy resources opens us up to defeat by our enemies. Again, we are letting a small group of people dictate our lives and our economy. WHY?
James Bartis, lead researcher with the study says we've got more oil in this very compact area than the entire Middle East, more than 2 TRILLION barrels untapped. That's more than all the proven oil reserves of crude oil in the world today, reportsThe Denver Post.
Don't think 'OPEC' will drop its price even with this find? Think again! It's all about the competitive marketplace, it has to. Think OPEC just might be funding the progressive environmentalists? Cannot prove it, but would not doubt it.
All of this can be verified. Check it out at the links below:
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911
Curz Construction:
http://www.cruzconstruct.com/services.php
Monday, July 4, 2011
Why are so many people, black and white, deceived into voting for the Progressives?
I have seen postings by various people on Facebook, wondering why it is that so many people of color choose to vote for the Democrat party, when it is quite obvious that the Democrats are the ones that help keep them mired in their government dependency and poverty.
It is an interesting question when you examine history. From the time the slaves were all freed after the Civil war, the majority of blacks were Republicans. After all, it was the Party of Lincoln, the sponsors of their liberation, so why would they not be?
Most people do not know because of misinformation and blatant lies, that the Ku-klux-Klan was a Democrat terror organization. I have seen with my own eyes, an old, preserved list of names from the late 1800's, of black Republicans targeted by the Klan to be murdered.
When we got into the 1900's it was a Progressive Democrat, President Woodrow Wilson, who instituted segregation of blacks and whites in the military and schools and other organizations. In the 1950's President Eisenhower, a Republican, wanted to sign the first Civil Rights bill to grant equal rights regardless of race. It was the Senate Majority Leader at the time, the progressive Lyndon B. Johnson, who kept that Civil Rights bill from passing. Then later, in the 1960's, when Johnson became president, he got that same Civil Rights bill passed, and helped to make it look like it was he and his fellow Democrats, not Republicans, who wanted civil liberties for all people black and white.
The black population of the USA and many whites as well, have been duped into voting for the Democrats ever since. Which is a perfect example of why Democracy does not work. People can be easily mislead and deceived with lies told by many of the politicians and their accomplices in the main stream media, and the people not having the time or the know how to do the research to discover the truth for themselves, vote as they are misinformed on, time and time again.
And so it is that with intrique and deception, the Progressive-Democrats have used the misguided and deceived the majority of the black population of the USA to usurp power time and time again over the years. Today they are performing the same deceptions and usury of the Hispanic populations, and the workers unions.
And so it goes, on and on, until today, the majority of the people, black,white, brown and unionized, are so steeped in immorality as a way of life, it is quite impossible for them to be governed by true freedom which the Constitution is supposed to afford. I fear the only thing that will restore true Constitutional government and true liberty and freedom will be some kind of Heaven sent cataclysmic cleansing. Throughout all of history, such cleansing has usually taken place through war, with the wicked destroying the wicked. I have wondered if it would be war that would sweep through our nation. My grandfather conjectured that it would be the Communist Soviets and Chinese that would sweep through our lands. Today I have to wonder if it will be the nations of Islam that will attack us in mass. But the more I study the prophecies of Isaiah and John the Revelator and other inspired and righteous men, I am more apt to believe that it will start with our own people fighting our own people in the streets of the biggest cities, with American blood shed by other Americans, flowing through the streets. That then will be followed by some kind of plague like disease that will wipe this land clear of the most sinful and despotic of people and their wicked political leaders.
Only after that cleansing takes place will the Constitution truly be followed again, and this great nation of America, one nation, Under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, will endure until the end of time.
It is an interesting question when you examine history. From the time the slaves were all freed after the Civil war, the majority of blacks were Republicans. After all, it was the Party of Lincoln, the sponsors of their liberation, so why would they not be?
Most people do not know because of misinformation and blatant lies, that the Ku-klux-Klan was a Democrat terror organization. I have seen with my own eyes, an old, preserved list of names from the late 1800's, of black Republicans targeted by the Klan to be murdered.
When we got into the 1900's it was a Progressive Democrat, President Woodrow Wilson, who instituted segregation of blacks and whites in the military and schools and other organizations. In the 1950's President Eisenhower, a Republican, wanted to sign the first Civil Rights bill to grant equal rights regardless of race. It was the Senate Majority Leader at the time, the progressive Lyndon B. Johnson, who kept that Civil Rights bill from passing. Then later, in the 1960's, when Johnson became president, he got that same Civil Rights bill passed, and helped to make it look like it was he and his fellow Democrats, not Republicans, who wanted civil liberties for all people black and white.
The black population of the USA and many whites as well, have been duped into voting for the Democrats ever since. Which is a perfect example of why Democracy does not work. People can be easily mislead and deceived with lies told by many of the politicians and their accomplices in the main stream media, and the people not having the time or the know how to do the research to discover the truth for themselves, vote as they are misinformed on, time and time again.
And so it is that with intrique and deception, the Progressive-Democrats have used the misguided and deceived the majority of the black population of the USA to usurp power time and time again over the years. Today they are performing the same deceptions and usury of the Hispanic populations, and the workers unions.
And so it goes, on and on, until today, the majority of the people, black,white, brown and unionized, are so steeped in immorality as a way of life, it is quite impossible for them to be governed by true freedom which the Constitution is supposed to afford. I fear the only thing that will restore true Constitutional government and true liberty and freedom will be some kind of Heaven sent cataclysmic cleansing. Throughout all of history, such cleansing has usually taken place through war, with the wicked destroying the wicked. I have wondered if it would be war that would sweep through our nation. My grandfather conjectured that it would be the Communist Soviets and Chinese that would sweep through our lands. Today I have to wonder if it will be the nations of Islam that will attack us in mass. But the more I study the prophecies of Isaiah and John the Revelator and other inspired and righteous men, I am more apt to believe that it will start with our own people fighting our own people in the streets of the biggest cities, with American blood shed by other Americans, flowing through the streets. That then will be followed by some kind of plague like disease that will wipe this land clear of the most sinful and despotic of people and their wicked political leaders.
Only after that cleansing takes place will the Constitution truly be followed again, and this great nation of America, one nation, Under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, will endure until the end of time.
Saturday, April 30, 2011
A few thoughts about how progressives have shaped and changed our American Culture
A couple thoughts...
Thought No. 1:
The things that Obama says about conducting studies to determine why energy prices are so high can really only be described as a farce.
The fact that Obama succeeded in getting the masses to vote for him in his first presidential election is a clear evidence of why Democracy does not work. The masses are often misguided into voting for something that they do not understand.
Obama's supposed caring for our pain at obtaining energy to run our businesses and move our families around town, rings pretty hollow when you consider that within the last few months, after closing down off shore oil drilling to companies that provide energy to America, he granted several $Billion dollars to Brazil to help pay for their off shore oil exploration and extraction. After which he made a public declaration that "America wanted to be Brazil's best customer!" All the while not doing a thing to facilitate the access of the vast amount of energy reserves under the surface of America. There is more energy reserves under the north slope of Alaska, under Utah, and under Colorado and Wyoming to last America for another 500 years!
And we have the technology to extract our energy reserves without doing damage to the environment, so that argument does not work any more. We do not have to be dependent on OPEC Nations that we are now subject too, who would just as well kill us if they could.
Obama's commenting about conducting a study to find out why gasoline prices are so high is really nothing more than re-election rhetoric. It is an attempt to get people to think he cares and that he is doing something, so that they will be more inclined to vote for him in 2012.
Thought No. 1:
The things that Obama says about conducting studies to determine why energy prices are so high can really only be described as a farce.
The fact that Obama succeeded in getting the masses to vote for him in his first presidential election is a clear evidence of why Democracy does not work. The masses are often misguided into voting for something that they do not understand.
Obama's supposed caring for our pain at obtaining energy to run our businesses and move our families around town, rings pretty hollow when you consider that within the last few months, after closing down off shore oil drilling to companies that provide energy to America, he granted several $Billion dollars to Brazil to help pay for their off shore oil exploration and extraction. After which he made a public declaration that "America wanted to be Brazil's best customer!" All the while not doing a thing to facilitate the access of the vast amount of energy reserves under the surface of America. There is more energy reserves under the north slope of Alaska, under Utah, and under Colorado and Wyoming to last America for another 500 years!
And we have the technology to extract our energy reserves without doing damage to the environment, so that argument does not work any more. We do not have to be dependent on OPEC Nations that we are now subject too, who would just as well kill us if they could.
Obama's commenting about conducting a study to find out why gasoline prices are so high is really nothing more than re-election rhetoric. It is an attempt to get people to think he cares and that he is doing something, so that they will be more inclined to vote for him in 2012.
On top of all that, there is the fact that George Soros, the multi billionaire tycoon who has personally, successfully collapsed the economies of other countries, has major stock and interest in the Brazilian oil industry. So these billions of dollars Obama gave to Brazil are directly benefitting George Soros. You may recall Mr. Soros made blantant announcements that he intends to collapse the American economy as well. George Soros is definitely in league with Progressives, if he is not their actual leader in chief.
So tell me again how much Obama really cares about finding out why gasoline prices are so high for American consumers?
The truth of the matter is that Obama and his Progressive cronies are deliberately doing everything they can to collapse our economic system, so that the doorway can be opened up to dissolving our current Republic, and installing an oligarchy that leads to a world government.
If Obama and his cronies did any of the things he needs to do to get us off foreign oil dependence, etc. and keep prices
If Obama and his cronies did any of the things he needs to do to get us off foreign oil dependence, etc. and keep prices
affordable for the average American consumer, that would fly
contrary to the progressive agenda, which is primarily to
collapse our country, by first collapsing our economic system.
This can all be verified in the writings of Saul Alinsky, and
This can all be verified in the writings of Saul Alinsky, and
Cloward & Piven, which are blue prints for the deliberate
process the progressives are following to destroy our
freedom... our liberty and rights.
So for the suggestion to be made that Obama is doing things wrong... as if he is just a democrat with bad policy, is not really an accurate assessment. Obama is doing things exactly and deliberately as he intends, for collapsing our economy and destroying our republic. Indeed there are many progressives who are upset with Obama because they think he is not moving fast enough to collapse our government! Obama is an enemy to the Constitution and a traitor to our Republic. I would suggest that he certainly qualifies to be dispatched back to the spirit world for quiet solitude and meditation.
So for the suggestion to be made that Obama is doing things wrong... as if he is just a democrat with bad policy, is not really an accurate assessment. Obama is doing things exactly and deliberately as he intends, for collapsing our economy and destroying our republic. Indeed there are many progressives who are upset with Obama because they think he is not moving fast enough to collapse our government! Obama is an enemy to the Constitution and a traitor to our Republic. I would suggest that he certainly qualifies to be dispatched back to the spirit world for quiet solitude and meditation.
Thought No. 2:
I understand the idea and thought about needing to create
more jobs for our economy. Politicians have talked about the
need to create more jobs for as long as I have been kicking
around on this little blue planet of ours.
In my business, what I do is help other people create their
In my business, what I do is help other people create their
own business, by using and then reselling an automatic
budgeting software program.
Part of that program includes a special tool that automatically
calculates tax write offs for the self employed. There are many,
tax deductions and write offs available to those who are self employed and many self employed people do not know about all of them. The software program I teach people how to promote
helps to identify those available deductions and saves the average self employed person as much as $200 a month in legitimate, IRS endorsed, tax write offs.
Here is the rub... the average employee does not get even close to the amount of tax reduction benefits that a self employed individual qualifies to receive. I find it interesting to note that before the 1900's most people made their living by being in business for self. Indeed for the first 150 years of this American nation, our country was built on the backs of entrepreneurs.
In the early years of the 1900's, we started to shift away from being entrepreneurs and settling for being employees, as progressives
started to make their moves to destroy the greatness of America. They took over the national education system and started teaching kids to be good employees instead of entrepreneurs. As a result, our culture today is filled with the constant political rhetoric about how much everyone needs a job and how the government is supposed to "do more" to create jobs. Why? Why does every one need to have a job? Why are we not encouraging and teaching people to start their own businesses, instead of looking for a job? Certainly those who are paying attention recognize that there is no more security in having a job today.
I am going to suggest a couple reasons that can be observed from
paying attention to our history over the last 100 years...
One reason is to keep people paying more taxes. You see, the government collects much more taxes from employees who have their taxes deducted out of their paychecks before they get paid.
I would suggest that if the majority of people had to pay their taxes after they got paid, instead of before, we would have had another revolution by now.
One reason is to keep people paying more taxes. You see, the government collects much more taxes from employees who have their taxes deducted out of their paychecks before they get paid.
I would suggest that if the majority of people had to pay their taxes after they got paid, instead of before, we would have had another revolution by now.
On the other hand, the self employed entrepreneur does not
have someone else deduct their taxes out of their pay checks.
They have to pay their taxes on their own at some period of time
in the future after they earn their money. If self employed people do their research and know what they are doing, they pay less tax
than the average employee does. So it stands to reason that
our corrupt government is more interested in talking about and
promoting "Jobs" because the government can collect much
more from employees than from the self employed entrepreneurs.
And at the same time they promote class envy, to convince the "jobbers" that the so called "rich" are not paying their fair share of the tax burden.
It is so much easier to control employees who have so many of their day to day decisions made for them by a boss or larger corporate executive leadership, which can be and often is, in league with progressive leadership. Controlling entrepreneurs who design and shape their own destiny is certainly much more challenging. Hence you see why there is so much government regulation on entrepreneurialism.
You can also start to understand why there is so much desire by progressives to raise taxes on the supposed "rich" people of America. Who are the rich? Progressives never seem to qualify what the criteria is for being rich, but I can assure you that it includes everyone who is self employed. It is the so called "Rich" people who own businesses and employ people with "jobs."
So what is going to happen if rich entrepreneurs are forced to pay more taxes? Many of them are going to go out of business. What happens then? All their employees lose their jobs. What happens then? Many of those employees, when they are unable to find other jobs, may very well end up on Government Welfare, unemployement checks. What happens when the government has more people on Welfare than producing tax paying income? The economic system collapses and the Republic is dissolved and an oligarchy government is set up in it's place, moving us towards one world government.
Are you starting to see a deliberate process here? Remember Saul Alinsky and Cloward & Piven? It is all in their writings. Don't take my word for it. Go find out for yourself!
And at the same time they promote class envy, to convince the "jobbers" that the so called "rich" are not paying their fair share of the tax burden.
It is so much easier to control employees who have so many of their day to day decisions made for them by a boss or larger corporate executive leadership, which can be and often is, in league with progressive leadership. Controlling entrepreneurs who design and shape their own destiny is certainly much more challenging. Hence you see why there is so much government regulation on entrepreneurialism.
You can also start to understand why there is so much desire by progressives to raise taxes on the supposed "rich" people of America. Who are the rich? Progressives never seem to qualify what the criteria is for being rich, but I can assure you that it includes everyone who is self employed. It is the so called "Rich" people who own businesses and employ people with "jobs."
So what is going to happen if rich entrepreneurs are forced to pay more taxes? Many of them are going to go out of business. What happens then? All their employees lose their jobs. What happens then? Many of those employees, when they are unable to find other jobs, may very well end up on Government Welfare, unemployement checks. What happens when the government has more people on Welfare than producing tax paying income? The economic system collapses and the Republic is dissolved and an oligarchy government is set up in it's place, moving us towards one world government.
Are you starting to see a deliberate process here? Remember Saul Alinsky and Cloward & Piven? It is all in their writings. Don't take my word for it. Go find out for yourself!
The other reason is because of the adulteration of Capitalism.
The whole concept of Capitalism has been perverted over the
last century. True Capitalism is about people using resources
to be in business, creating products or services that they sell
for more than it cost them to make the product, or provide a service, thus manufacturing a profit, and thereby make their living.
Unfortunately, Capitalism has been exploited by Corporations
Unfortunately, Capitalism has been exploited by Corporations
where the owners or board of directors have grown greedy,
and have built their companies into huge Corporations with so
many millions or billions of dollars behind them, that there is
no way for small time entrepreneurs to compete.
One example out of many like this, is Monsato. Monsato has literally forced hundreds of small time farmers out of business with their genetic mutations of seeds that they have patents on. Those genetically mutated patented seeds end up blown by the wind into the fields of small time farmers, who are then constrained to pay fees to Monsato. If they do not pay, they are then sued for having the Monsato seed in their crops.
As a result, Monsato is a multi billion dollar corporation that has
thousands of employees, who are paying lots of taxes to the
government, and Monsato owns a huge share of all farming in
the USA. And wouldn't you know it, they happen to be in league
with progressive politicians making legislation that favors their
big corporations and disfavors small time entrepreneurs.
What better way for progressives to control the masses of
What better way for progressives to control the masses of
people, than to have the masses forced to work as employee
minions of giant corporations who are mostly out for power
and greed.
Now, in fairness, I must say that not all big corporations are out
Now, in fairness, I must say that not all big corporations are out
to control the masses and deliberately put small business
competitors out of business. But much of big business does use their
huge amounts of capital to maintain power and control over
people in many ways, too numerous to expand on right here,
right now.
I would suggest that Capitalism as it is practiced today by big
I would suggest that Capitalism as it is practiced today by big
power hungry corporations should really be called Corporatism.
Capitalism is a good thing. Giant corporations that control
people's lives and put small time entrepreneurs out of business
is not a good thing. Capitalism is good. Corporatism is not good.
In fact I would be so bold as to say Corporatism is out-n-out evil!
Progressives in the media, the Universities and the Halls of
In fact I would be so bold as to say Corporatism is out-n-out evil!
Progressives in the media, the Universities and the Halls of
Government love to talk about the evils of Capitalism. Which is
ironic, since it was Progressives who set up the very circumstances that have lead to how perverted Capitalism has become.
It was the early 1900's when Progressives under Teddy
Roosevelt and later on, more so under Woodrow Wilson,
started to create all kinds of bureaucratic controls on
business, making regulation tighter and tougher for the average
person to be an entrepreneur. Eventually it got to a point that
mostly big corporations that had plenty of capital to deal with
the regulations, or to even find ways to get around the regulation,
continued to grow and dominate and be motivated by power
and greed, making capitalism look really bad.
But as I said before, Capitalism, as it was originally intended to be, is a good thing, and we as a nation would be better off if we were
But as I said before, Capitalism, as it was originally intended to be, is a good thing, and we as a nation would be better off if we were
to go back to a truly capitalistic society where people work as
small time entrepreneurs, instead of all this focus on creating
more jobs for people to be able to pay more taxes and have
less freedom and control over their own lives as they are
controlled by the big corporations and big progressive
government.
Definitely some things to think about and take some action on.
Would love to have your thoughts and feedback.
Definitely some things to think about and take some action on.
Would love to have your thoughts and feedback.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Is the end of our Nation as we now know it on the horizon?
It has been said by honest and well intentioned people within my hearing that there are those who believe that we need to return to constitutionally responsible government. That government should be prevented from borrowing money and that the outrageous debt that looms over our liberty and freedom, should be paid down to lower the principal and interest. Pay the interest on the Federal debt, and some on the principal. Bring all of our troops home and close our boarders. Do not allow borrowing, as the government should operate on current revenue only.
My counsel and support would be to do what was suggested above insofar as bringing our troops home and securing our boarders. But I don't feel the same about paying down the principle and interest on the national debt. What has the Trillions of dollars that make up the debt gone for? Where is the accountability for all that money? I have not seen one penny of it. Have you? Has anyone? Do we have government of the people, by the people and for the people, or don't we? If we do, as we are supposed to, I know I certainly did not authorize the spending of all that money. I know that my state representative in Congress did not authorize it. I cannot say the same for our representatives in the Senate, how ever. I am very glad to have Bob Bennett out of the Senate, and look forward to seeing Orrin Hatch go home to spend more time with his family as well.
But, I have not seen any accounting for what that Trillions of dollars has been used for. The Federal Reserve has issued worthless money, that the Federal government has done, who- knows-what with, and we and our children's, children's, children, are expected to be slaves to work for the rest of our lives to pay back the principal and interest on that worthless money?
I don't think so! I say we make up a large coin made out of pot ash waste metal, that reads $14 Trillion on the side of the coin, or whatever the debt amount is up to when the time comes, and we pay back the debt with that. It will have about as much value as the worthless currency they give us.
I think a better and wiser strategy is to abolish the Federal Reserve completely, altogether, which is not a government agency to begin with.
If we must have a national banking system, then there should be a national bank headquarters, with assigned branches in each State. One percent of the interest the bank collects from borrowers, should be sufficient to pay for operating costs of the bank, and the remainder of the profits from interest on loans should be turned over to a general national fund to eliminate or at least cut way down on the need for taxes by the National government. In the same manner, any State banks would be allowed to use their profits to eliminate or cut way back on State taxes.
My counsel and support would be to do what was suggested above insofar as bringing our troops home and securing our boarders. But I don't feel the same about paying down the principle and interest on the national debt. What has the Trillions of dollars that make up the debt gone for? Where is the accountability for all that money? I have not seen one penny of it. Have you? Has anyone? Do we have government of the people, by the people and for the people, or don't we? If we do, as we are supposed to, I know I certainly did not authorize the spending of all that money. I know that my state representative in Congress did not authorize it. I cannot say the same for our representatives in the Senate, how ever. I am very glad to have Bob Bennett out of the Senate, and look forward to seeing Orrin Hatch go home to spend more time with his family as well.
But, I have not seen any accounting for what that Trillions of dollars has been used for. The Federal Reserve has issued worthless money, that the Federal government has done, who- knows-what with, and we and our children's, children's, children, are expected to be slaves to work for the rest of our lives to pay back the principal and interest on that worthless money?
I don't think so! I say we make up a large coin made out of pot ash waste metal, that reads $14 Trillion on the side of the coin, or whatever the debt amount is up to when the time comes, and we pay back the debt with that. It will have about as much value as the worthless currency they give us.
I think a better and wiser strategy is to abolish the Federal Reserve completely, altogether, which is not a government agency to begin with.
If we must have a national banking system, then there should be a national bank headquarters, with assigned branches in each State. One percent of the interest the bank collects from borrowers, should be sufficient to pay for operating costs of the bank, and the remainder of the profits from interest on loans should be turned over to a general national fund to eliminate or at least cut way down on the need for taxes by the National government. In the same manner, any State banks would be allowed to use their profits to eliminate or cut way back on State taxes.
What say ye? Am I engaged in wishful thinking? I think not. It may not come to pass any time soon, but I believe that it will come to pass before the second coming of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. America will be cleansed of the wicked who have perverted the right ways of God, and destroyed our constitutionally limited government, which was inspired and instituted by the God of this land, Himself. In centuries past, such cleansing of the wicked has most often happened through pestilence or war. I believe that this time, the cleansing of America will happen by pestilence. Most likely a serious plague like desease similar to the bubonic plague of the 13th century in Europe. After the cleansing, a new government that uses our same Old Glory American Flag, and follows our current Constitution as it was written in 1787, and models the governing system implemented by Moses with the children of Israel will be set up. And some time after that, the Great and terrible day of the Lord will occur, and then it won't matter any more. :-)
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
How to really eliminate Divorce and Save Marriages and Families in America
I used to think, when I was a student at the University of Utah, majoring in Psychology and Interpersonal Communication many years ago, that teaching couples to communicate effectively would be a huge help in reducing divorce rates.
I have come to realize in my studies of the Gospels of Jesus Christ, and from many of the teachings of the general authority leaders in the Church I am a member of, which is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, that there is nothing in the teachings of our Lord about learning to communicate better. There is nothing about learning how to handle money better, or any of the other many problems that couples will divorce over.
No. I believe with all my heart that if people learned to follow the teachings of Christ, to Love God with all their heart, might, mind and strength, and to love thy neighbor as thyself, the two great commandments on which all other commandments hang, and to over come pride, and envy and selfishness, to have charity the pure love of Christ, which is the greatest of all the attributes of God, to really understand and live the Beattitudes that Christ taught us from his Sermon on the Mount, to strive to live with faith, hope and charity, to be patient and long suffering, all the kinds of attributes that Christ exemplified during his time on Earth, we would eliminate the majority of divorces and strengthen families significantly, and thus eliminate a huge amount of the ills of our society.
I realize that this is easier talked about than done, but we have to start some where. I have been through a divorce and lost the confidence of my children. All because of my not following the teachings of the Savior when that all happened. I cannot change the past, but I can shape the future. I am in a very happy marriage right now, but it is only happy, I have found, because of the fact that my sweetheart and I strive to live the teachings of the Savior. We are not perfect at it by a long shot, but we are trying. And if we ever mess up and make a mistake, we forgive each other, gird up our loins and go forward with faith in the Atonement of Jesus Christ. It brings us true hope, happiness and joy. I do not know a single person who does not strive to follow the teachings of Christ, who has lasting happiness and joy. They have moments of pleasure and temporary happy moments along the way, but long lasting? I have not seen it.
What do you think about these ideas? Would love to read your comments. Thanks for reading.
I have come to realize in my studies of the Gospels of Jesus Christ, and from many of the teachings of the general authority leaders in the Church I am a member of, which is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, that there is nothing in the teachings of our Lord about learning to communicate better. There is nothing about learning how to handle money better, or any of the other many problems that couples will divorce over.
No. I believe with all my heart that if people learned to follow the teachings of Christ, to Love God with all their heart, might, mind and strength, and to love thy neighbor as thyself, the two great commandments on which all other commandments hang, and to over come pride, and envy and selfishness, to have charity the pure love of Christ, which is the greatest of all the attributes of God, to really understand and live the Beattitudes that Christ taught us from his Sermon on the Mount, to strive to live with faith, hope and charity, to be patient and long suffering, all the kinds of attributes that Christ exemplified during his time on Earth, we would eliminate the majority of divorces and strengthen families significantly, and thus eliminate a huge amount of the ills of our society.
I realize that this is easier talked about than done, but we have to start some where. I have been through a divorce and lost the confidence of my children. All because of my not following the teachings of the Savior when that all happened. I cannot change the past, but I can shape the future. I am in a very happy marriage right now, but it is only happy, I have found, because of the fact that my sweetheart and I strive to live the teachings of the Savior. We are not perfect at it by a long shot, but we are trying. And if we ever mess up and make a mistake, we forgive each other, gird up our loins and go forward with faith in the Atonement of Jesus Christ. It brings us true hope, happiness and joy. I do not know a single person who does not strive to follow the teachings of Christ, who has lasting happiness and joy. They have moments of pleasure and temporary happy moments along the way, but long lasting? I have not seen it.
What do you think about these ideas? Would love to read your comments. Thanks for reading.
Friday, February 4, 2011
Hypocrisy Illustrated: Leftists accuse Conservatives of what they themselves normally do...
Have any of you seen the videos online that show marxist protestors in this country (USA) calling for death to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and talk show host Glenn Beck, among others? This is the very thing that the media and progressives are always trying to accuse Conservatives, such as Tea Party participants, etc. of doing. Talk about hypocrisy to the max!
I have observed over the years that those who engage in negative activities are always most likely to accuse others of the kind of activities they themselves would engage in. Sort of like when last years Speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi, first accused the Tea Party rallies as being organized by the radical right, behind the scenes. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Tea Parties were originally, truly grass roots rallies.
However, there is plenty of evidence that leftist rallies usually bus in their participants, who are often members of the big workers Unions who protest and act violently in their rallies. See? The left... ie Nancy Pelosi, accuses Conservatives, ie the tea parties, of doing what they normally do.
Another point in fact... I know of no truly conservative person or group, that endorses, let alone engages in violence, but I know of many instances when people on the left engage in violent talk, and as we can see in Europe and the middle east, lots of violent action.
I also find it interesting that Hollywood is mostly made up of people who believe in marxist ideology and there are so many films and movies that are produced in Holllywood that are chalk full of violence! Some would argue that Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis and Arnold Swartzeneggar are conservatives, who produced lots of violent films, but I would argue that they are anything but conservative. They are Republicans in Name Only. RINO's, I believe is the correct term.
So, again we see how the American Political left routinely accuses the conservatives of actions that they themselves would engage in.
In the world of psychology, this is called transference, and is often seen in family behaviors when one family member will accuse other family members of doing the harmful things that they themselves do, often in total denial that they are doing so, and usually subconsciously done in an effort to shift attention away from themselves and their damaging behaviors.
In this case, we have all the proof we need in the videos posted on youtube. If you have not seen the videos I am referencing, visit youtube.com and type in search words, "Rally in Rancho Mirage," or "Take their money," and "Progressive Rallyists call for lynching of Clarence Thomas," You'll see other related videos posted there on the side.
Talk about things that makes ya go hmmm!
Follow up: Some people would argue that Nazi Skinheads are right wingers who engage in violence. This is also a falsehood. Nazi's are not right wingers. They are another version of leftist totalitarianism, not much different than Communists or Islamists, or any other kind of left wing, control the masses kind of government. Nazism controls the people, takes away their liberties and rights, no different that Marxism.
A more correct use of the terms right, vs. left is to show how those on the Far right are anarchists who want no government at all. The Far left is totalitarianism with no freedom at all. Where we liberty loving people belong is in the middle, where we have just enough government to assure protection of our liberty and rights through the rule of law. Anything else is totally unacceptable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y43a6BsNQb4
I have observed over the years that those who engage in negative activities are always most likely to accuse others of the kind of activities they themselves would engage in. Sort of like when last years Speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi, first accused the Tea Party rallies as being organized by the radical right, behind the scenes. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Tea Parties were originally, truly grass roots rallies.
However, there is plenty of evidence that leftist rallies usually bus in their participants, who are often members of the big workers Unions who protest and act violently in their rallies. See? The left... ie Nancy Pelosi, accuses Conservatives, ie the tea parties, of doing what they normally do.
Another point in fact... I know of no truly conservative person or group, that endorses, let alone engages in violence, but I know of many instances when people on the left engage in violent talk, and as we can see in Europe and the middle east, lots of violent action.
I also find it interesting that Hollywood is mostly made up of people who believe in marxist ideology and there are so many films and movies that are produced in Holllywood that are chalk full of violence! Some would argue that Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis and Arnold Swartzeneggar are conservatives, who produced lots of violent films, but I would argue that they are anything but conservative. They are Republicans in Name Only. RINO's, I believe is the correct term.
So, again we see how the American Political left routinely accuses the conservatives of actions that they themselves would engage in.
In the world of psychology, this is called transference, and is often seen in family behaviors when one family member will accuse other family members of doing the harmful things that they themselves do, often in total denial that they are doing so, and usually subconsciously done in an effort to shift attention away from themselves and their damaging behaviors.
In this case, we have all the proof we need in the videos posted on youtube. If you have not seen the videos I am referencing, visit youtube.com and type in search words, "Rally in Rancho Mirage," or "Take their money," and "Progressive Rallyists call for lynching of Clarence Thomas," You'll see other related videos posted there on the side.
Talk about things that makes ya go hmmm!
Follow up: Some people would argue that Nazi Skinheads are right wingers who engage in violence. This is also a falsehood. Nazi's are not right wingers. They are another version of leftist totalitarianism, not much different than Communists or Islamists, or any other kind of left wing, control the masses kind of government. Nazism controls the people, takes away their liberties and rights, no different that Marxism.
A more correct use of the terms right, vs. left is to show how those on the Far right are anarchists who want no government at all. The Far left is totalitarianism with no freedom at all. Where we liberty loving people belong is in the middle, where we have just enough government to assure protection of our liberty and rights through the rule of law. Anything else is totally unacceptable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y43a6BsNQb4
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)